The house on Duncan and the house on Arla are two different house that they have many things in common as different house that they have many things in comon as differents too.
The ducan house has simeliar they both have same 6 room, have cars ports and it cost 90.000. will they have differences to the DUcan has a brick it has a big yard and low heating bills will the Arla house is wood it has no yard and high heating bills.
In conclusion the ducan house and the house on arla has many similiary and defference but they both a house were people live together.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Argumentative Essay
Children and the mobile phone an addiction, necessary or just fun. There is no doubting the benifits of the mobile phone. The benefits have been sold to us worldwise by the mobile phone industry it makes an easy way to communicated different type of people all over the world. The main we have made the judgment that, yes, the mobile phone is an exceptionally useful tool that advances personal communication beyond all our expections of only a few years ago. However mobile phones can be bad to for yought children one of the most important is that it would increase the rate of accidents or get in trouble at school home etc.
The parents from all over the world says "mobile phone are good because they allow them to contac their children in case of an emergency or the children can contac their parents when they got home" while i think cell phone are useful but not for a youg children becuase they still dont have the mind to figured out what they doing another reason why i think children shouldn't have cell phones because mobile phones cann't allow them to learn how they suppost to for they age an example of what things can happen to yough children while they are in school or walking to home is that last week a girl in new york got kill becuase she got shut after they stole her cell phone.
All of our "parents think they have a good way of controling what their kids are a doing in their cell phone" but no not even reponsible parents know what their kids are doing because they don't just use cell phones to call them they use as a computer device where they can chat, send text messege, take pictures and put them in a web page or lising to music while they are in school. we see a increase seen 2000 just 5 percent of 13-17 years old have cell phones today 56 percent according to Linda Barrabee and it could also cause cancer to the brain.
Parent said "they can handle teens having a cell phone because they benefits them to be a social person" while i think no it doesnt make no differences haveing or not a cell phone. Cell phones just brings waste of money like a father have a daughter she is 16 yrs old they give her $20 with extra money for school dinner and they found out that all the money has being waste on text messeging her friends. she hasn't had a meal in school for the past 3 months and worst of all considers no other activity or hobby worthyof her pocket money.
In summary, mobile phones are not usefull for teens because when the mobile phone becomes not just an essential item for communication but instead something that takes control of a child's life, parents have the right to be worried. Firstly we have parents that think cell phones are a good think they help them and they just take away one responsability from being parents. Secondly parents doens't have any sense of what consequeses mobile phones brings. Thirdly childrens will no longer communicate with the family,her phone has to be beside her day and nigh we often hear them talking or text messeging on the phone and they said she is no longer the daughter we had.
The parents from all over the world says "mobile phone are good because they allow them to contac their children in case of an emergency or the children can contac their parents when they got home" while i think cell phone are useful but not for a youg children becuase they still dont have the mind to figured out what they doing another reason why i think children shouldn't have cell phones because mobile phones cann't allow them to learn how they suppost to for they age an example of what things can happen to yough children while they are in school or walking to home is that last week a girl in new york got kill becuase she got shut after they stole her cell phone.
All of our "parents think they have a good way of controling what their kids are a doing in their cell phone" but no not even reponsible parents know what their kids are doing because they don't just use cell phones to call them they use as a computer device where they can chat, send text messege, take pictures and put them in a web page or lising to music while they are in school. we see a increase seen 2000 just 5 percent of 13-17 years old have cell phones today 56 percent according to Linda Barrabee and it could also cause cancer to the brain.
Parent said "they can handle teens having a cell phone because they benefits them to be a social person" while i think no it doesnt make no differences haveing or not a cell phone. Cell phones just brings waste of money like a father have a daughter she is 16 yrs old they give her $20 with extra money for school dinner and they found out that all the money has being waste on text messeging her friends. she hasn't had a meal in school for the past 3 months and worst of all considers no other activity or hobby worthyof her pocket money.
In summary, mobile phones are not usefull for teens because when the mobile phone becomes not just an essential item for communication but instead something that takes control of a child's life, parents have the right to be worried. Firstly we have parents that think cell phones are a good think they help them and they just take away one responsability from being parents. Secondly parents doens't have any sense of what consequeses mobile phones brings. Thirdly childrens will no longer communicate with the family,her phone has to be beside her day and nigh we often hear them talking or text messeging on the phone and they said she is no longer the daughter we had.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)